De nition of the Agile Development and Testing Process in Software Generator USS Code 128 in Software De nition of the Agile Development and Testing Process

How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:
20.3 De nition of the Agile Development and Testing Process using vs .net touse qr-code in web,windows application Postnet 3 of 5 My agile process incorporated Visual Studio .NET QR Code 2d barcode the following characteristics: RUPesque Having been exposed to the Rational Uni ed Process (RUP [7]) at college, I employed a fundamentally RUP-like approach to the iterations (that I termed the RUPesque method). I also included elements of the V-model [4] to enable me to convince my manager that I was doing some formal planning of the project.

(It seems managers like to be reassured about these things.) A small team (not co-located; see Section 20.5 for details of how I overcame the issues of lack of co-location) comprised the customer/user (basically the team I had been assigned to during my industrial placement), the project manager (my boss),.

In my young and innocent stat e, I did begin to wonder if the Requirements Creep might actually be a role held by one of the team members perhaps the person responsible for coming up with new and crazy requirements.;-). Very-Small-Scale Agile Development and Testing of a Wiki the developer and tester (me) , and ad hoc resources (a member of the team as and when needed for pair development and test see later discussion). Short iterations (matched to a week-long cycle to coincide with and to piggyback on an existing weekly team telephone conference call on Friday afternoon to allow the users [i.e.

, the team members] to review the previous week s development and provide comments for the next week s work). Agile requirements capture and maintenance (documented using an agile requirements tool [61]). Rapid prototyping I relied heavily on a prototyping approach in which I would produce simple mock-ups (essentially just demonstrating the navigation and the basic features requested by the users) to show to the users in order to obtain their feedback on the suitability of the proposed system (formally during the Friday conference call, but also informally [but then documented in the requirement tool] via the SameTime instant messaging system [a facility available under Lotus Notes]).

Pair development To make particularly fast progress, I organized a number of intensive sessions where I worked with an experienced member of the team at the same workstation, bashing out code, and producing very good results (see Section 20.5). Pair development was particularly valuable where I had very challenging timescales and proved to be an excellent technique for very intensive development and testing and rapid delivery of good-quality software.

Pair testing Again, working with my colleague, we identi ed suitable test scenarios, test data (including boundary and partition values), and employed statetransition techniques to design tests to verify correct navigation [4]. I have broken this out separately from pair development, because I was so impressed by what turned out to be a particularly effective means of reducing defects. Manual tester packs I don t subscribe to the popular notion that all students are lazy, fun-loving, hedonistic parasites (well, not completely).

To avoid additional wasted testing effort, and to ensure I wasn t stuck in the of ce after 5 p.m. or (God forbid) testing on the weekend, I made sure that testing was as slick and ef cient as possible.

My main solution was to ensure I got maximum reuse from the tests that I (and my colleague, during pair testing) created. To this end: I created a simple test script template in the IBM Symphony word processor package and adopted a consistent script naming convention (a unique identi er formed from the iteration number, the Wiki page [and subpage], and an incremented number e.g.

, 02-TeamOrgChart-01). To promote test reuse, I ensured that all test scripts that were developed were led (both electronically as Symphony les and as paper-based copies in my test reuse folder, which was a le box with separate tabs into which the tests for separate iterations were stored)..

Copyright © . All rights reserved.