Claims Processing in WCF in .NET Printing barcode standards 128 in .NET Claims Processing in WCF

How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:

Claims Processing in WCF using barcode integration for .net vs 2010 control to generate, create code 128 code set b image in .net vs 2010 applications. Internatioanl Orgnization for Standardization Claims are visual .net Code-128 a first class citizen of WCF and are represented by the Claim type. A claim represents an assertion by a consumer that it has a right to the requested resource.

That resource might be possession of an identity or permission, such as read access to a database. Claims can be constructed at runtime by creating an instance of the Claim class and setting its Type, Resource and Right properties, as follows:. Claim email Claim = new Claim (ClaimTypes.Email, "", Rights.

PossessProperty);. Example 17.7 As mentione d previously, a claim set represents a collection of claims issued by the same source. A claim set extracted from a CardSpace token would be placed in the security context with the CardSpace provider identified as the issuer. The Issuer member of ClaimSet is another ClaimSet that represents the issuer of the consumer program s claims.

. 17.1 Authentication and Authorization with WCF ClaimSet is an abstract class, meaning you cannot explicitly create an instance of ClaimSet. Instead, you must use the DefaultClaimSet type or create a new type. derived fro Code128 for .NET m ClaimSet and create an instance of that instead. It is important to note that once the claim set is created, it cannot be changed.

The WCF service model processes the security tokens provided in the message and creates claim sets based on the type of token being processed. The generated claims are placed in the security context and become accessible at runtime through the AuthorizationContext..

Authorizati onContext contains a quantity of ClaimSet equal to the number of secu-. rity tokens Visual Studio .NET Code 128C in the request and the number of authorization policies associated with the service. Accessing claims from the authorization context is quite straightforward as shown here:.

Authorizati onContext context = ServiceSecurityContext.Current.AuthorizationContext; foreach(ClaimSet claims in context.

ClaimSets) { WindowsClaimSet windowsClaims; if(claims.GetType() == typeof(WindowsClaimSet)) { windowsClaims = (WindowsClaimSet)claims; if(windowsClaims.ContainsClaim(new Claim (ClaimTypes.

Email, "", Rights.PossessProperty)) == false) throw new Exception("It"s not who we want it to be!"); } }.

Example 17.8 Implementing Claims-Based Authorization The value o Code 128C for .NET f a claims-based model is its ability to represent consumer assertions in a consistent manner, regardless of the source of the assertion. Most services need to support consumers regardless of domain or platform affiliation.

Authorizing resource access can prove exceptionally difficult without a means to normalize consumer credentials and security demands. Rather than restrict the service to a limited use model (such as roles), we can design a claims-based system that enables us to build a flexible authorization mechanism that is not bound to a specific credential type or collection of roles..

17: SOA Security with .NET and Windows Azure In this way VS .NET code128b the service can meet the authorization requirements of the consumer designers without affecting business requirements tied to consumer identities (Figure 17.3).

. Windows active directory X.509. SAML authorization manager certificates Figure 17.3 The claims-based WCF service model normalizes claims of different types in order to evaluate them in an identical manner..

Access Control in Windows Azure With Window s Azure services, authorization implementations and integrations can be externalized from the service logic and managed as a set of declarative rules through the use of Access Control. Windows Azure Access Control supports claims-based authorizations in federated identity scenarios, enabling single sign-on across separate security domains. For example, organizations that leverage Active Directory Federation Services (explained shortly in the Windows Identity Foundation (WIF) section) can enable users/ consumers to authenticate and sign on to external cloud-based services using the organization s identities.

Access Control features include: claims transformation engine using declarative rules and policies security token service (STS) support for multiple credentials, including Windows Live IDs, SAML tokens, and X.509 certificates setup Issuer trust with a simple Web interface or programmatically through APIs support for Active Directory and other identity infrastructures. 17.1 Authentication and Authorization with WCF Designing Custom Claims As is the c barcode 128 for .NET ase with any architectural approach to security, the first step is to determine which resources need to be protected and the requirements necessary to access those resources. The result of this activity becomes the basis of custom claims designed for the service.

Often times, a resource-centric security model is the most straightforward approach to take. The goal of service security is to protect the resources under the care of the service implementation. Resources can be data (such as a business entity) or a physical resource (such as a report).

Consumer rights can be established by defining a specific set of actions that can be performed on those resources. SERVICE PROTECTION PATTERNS Agnostic services can provide attractive targets for attackers, as each represents a potential single point of failure for multiple service compositions. Attackers can send malformed messages to such services to disrupt their stability or manipulate them to expose sensitive implementation details that further reveal weaknesses or leak private data.

The following established design patterns therefore exist to equip the internal service architecture with preventive logic: Message Screening [752] Exception Shielding [744] Furthermore, the Service Perimeter Guard [782] pattern provides an opportunity to centralize and reuse common security logic in order to establish an intermediary service as an access point on behalf of other services. Descriptions of these and other referenced security patterns are provided in Appendix D..

Copyright © . All rights reserved.