Creating New Form or Survey Elements in .NET Generator data matrix barcodes in .NET Creating New Form or Survey Elements

How to generate, print barcode using .NET, Java sdk library control with example project source code free download:
3.8.2. Creating New Form or Survey Elements using barcode writer for .net vs 2010 control to generate, create data matrix barcode image in .net vs 2010 applications. Java Projects In addition to th .net vs 2010 Data Matrix ECC200 ese active content enhancements to standard Web survey tools, the dynamic and graphical nature of the Web is leading to the creation of a wide range of measurement tools that previously could not be done on paper, or required special tools or procedures. A few examples of such tools include slider bars or visual analog scales, card sort tasks, ranking tools, and interactive maps.

Visual analog scale or slider bars are popular tools in Web surveys. While the visual analog scale (VAS) and graphic rating scale (GRS) have been around a long time (e.g.

, Hayes and Patterson, 1921; Freyd, 1923), they take extra effort to code and key when administered on paper, and the Web offers direct capture of a respondent s input with great accuracy. An example of a VAS or slider bar is illustrated in Figure 3.23.

The respondent clicks on the line to activate the slider and can then move the slider using the mouse until the desired position is reached. Visual analog scales have been implemented using Java (e.g.

, Bayer and Thomas, 2004; Brophy et al., 2004; Couper et al., 2006), JavaScript (e.

g., Funke, 2005; Lenert, Sturley, and Watson, 2002; Reips and Funke, in press), and Flash (Athale, Sturley, Skoczen, Kavanaugh, and Lenert, 2004). While the large literature on VAS implies the superiority of such online measurement tools, our own research.

124 r Designing Effective Web Surveys Figure 3.23 Visua .net vs 2010 2d Data Matrix barcode l Analog Scale or Slider Bar.

suggests that the results attained using a slider bar are quite similar to those from a discrete scale using a series of radio buttons (Couper et al., 2006; see also Bayer and Thomas, 2004; Cook, Heath, and Thompson, 2001; Thomas and Couper, 2007). Furthermore, our research found that the VAS produced higher rates of breakoffs and missing data, and took longer to complete than radio button or numeric input alternatives (Couper et al.

, 2006). While more research on the design and effectiveness of the VAS is needed, the early returns suggest that we are not gaining much by using such interactive tools. Nonetheless, slider bars are part of many Web survey vendors suite of tools.

A variety of related graphic input tools are being developed and tested (see, e.g., Lutters, Westphal, and Heublein, 2007; Stanley and Jenkins, 2007).

Similarly, online card sort tasks can be implemented using active scripting. A respondent drags a card with a visual or verbal description from the pack and drops it into one of several piles or buckets (see, e.g.

, Thomas, Bayer, Johnson, and Behnke, 2005). Figure 3.24 is an example from Green eld Online s Web site (www.


Ranking tasks are also making their way into the Web survey toolkit (e.g., Neubarth, 2006).

These involve a similar drag and drop action to card sort tasks. An even more sophisticated example that is increasingly popular in market research is the interactive grocery shelf, in which consumers can select items from a virtual shelf and place them in a shopping cart (e.g.

, Gadeib and Kunath, 2006;. Going Beyond the Basics r 125 Figure 3.24 Example Card Sort Task. /rcdemocenter.

htm). Other examples of the use of graphical and interactive elements can be found in Dahan and Hauser (2002) and Dahan and Srinivasan (2000). But many of these interactive tools have yet to be rigorously tested, not only in terms of the quality of the data they yield, but also in terms of the effort to develop and implement them, and in terms of respondents ability and willingness to use them.

For example, Neubarth (2006) compared ranking and rating tasks in a Web survey and found the ranking task to take longer, have higher dropout rates and greater technical dif culties, and lead to lower respondent satisfaction than the rating task. One nal set of tools to mention here relate to the use of image maps. While clickable images are a standard feature in HTML, I mention them brie y here because of the visual elements used, the fact that they offer a more interactive alternative to the standard pick list, and that they are hard to implement on paper.

Figure 3.25 shows an example of a clickable image. Each of the German states ( Bundeslande ) is de ned as a separate region on the HTML page.

In this example,.
Copyright © . All rights reserved.